Computed Tomography (CT) scans are a vital Health Care Scanner in modern medicine, offering unparalleled diagnostic capabilities, especially for children. While pediatric CT scans are invaluable for diagnosing a range of conditions from injuries to illnesses, the increasing use and associated radiation exposure raise significant public health concerns. This article explores the critical role of CT scans as a health care scanner, particularly in pediatric care, while emphasizing the importance of minimizing radiation risks in young patients. We will address the following key areas:
- The Diagnostic Value of CT Scanners
- Unique Radiation Sensitivity in Children
- Potential Radiation Risks from CT Scans in Pediatrics
- Strategies to Minimize Radiation Exposure in Pediatric CT Imaging
The Diagnostic Value of CT Scanners in Pediatric Care
CT scanners are life-saving health care tools, providing detailed internal images that aid in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of illnesses and injuries in children. For each child requiring a CT scan, the benefits of accurate and timely diagnosis significantly outweigh the small individual risks associated with the procedure when used judiciously.
In the United States alone, approximately 5 to 9 million CT scans are performed on children every year. Since 1980, the utilization of CT scans in both adults and children has increased dramatically, roughly eightfold, with an estimated annual growth rate of about 10 percent. This surge is largely attributed to the effectiveness of CT scanners in diagnosing common diseases and continuous advancements in CT technology, making them indispensable health care scanners.
Despite the numerous advantages of CT scans, a significant drawback is the inevitable exposure to ionizing radiation. Although CT scans constitute only about 12 percent of all diagnostic radiological procedures in major U.S. hospitals, they are responsible for approximately 49 percent of the collective radiation dose received by the U.S. population from medical x-ray examinations. This makes CT scanners the most significant contributor to medical radiation exposure within the U.S. population, highlighting the need for careful consideration in their application, especially in vulnerable pediatric patients.
Unique Radiation Sensitivity in Children Undergoing Health Care Scanner Procedures
Radiation exposure is a concern for all patients undergoing procedures involving health care scanners like CT machines. However, children present unique vulnerabilities that amplify these concerns:
- Increased Radiation Sensitivity: Children’s cells are more sensitive to radiation compared to adults. Epidemiological studies of exposed populations have consistently demonstrated this heightened sensitivity.
- Longer Lifespan and Opportunity for Radiation Damage: Children have a considerably longer life expectancy than adults. This extended lifespan provides a larger window for the manifestation of radiation-induced damage, increasing the potential for long-term health consequences.
- Potential for Overexposure: If CT scanner settings are not specifically adjusted for children’s smaller body sizes, they may receive unnecessarily higher doses of radiation. Adult protocols are often inappropriate for pediatric patients, leading to excessive exposure.
Consequently, the risk of developing radiation-related cancer can be several times higher for a young child compared to an adult receiving an identical CT scan. This underscores the importance of tailoring health care scanner protocols for pediatric patients.
Recent advancements in CT technology have led to equipment capable of producing higher quality images at lower radiation doses. Furthermore, the adoption of pediatric-specific settings has become more widespread, contributing to dose reduction in children. It is crucial to recognize that higher radiation doses are not necessary for children, and age-appropriate, optimized settings should always be implemented in pediatric health care scanner procedures.
Regardless of dose reduction efforts, repeated CT scans on a single patient are a particular concern. Additionally, performing multiple scans (multiple contrast “phases”) during a single examination further escalates radiation exposure. In the vast majority of pediatric CT cases, a single, well-planned scan should be sufficient, minimizing the cumulative radiation dose from health care scanners.
Radiation Risks from CT Scanners in Children: Understanding the Data
Leading national and international organizations that evaluate radiation risks concur that there is likely no safe “threshold” for radiation exposure regarding cancer induction. This means that no amount of ionizing radiation from health care scanners should be considered entirely risk-free.
The first study directly assessing cancer risk following CT scans in childhood revealed a clear dose-response relationship for both leukemia and brain tumors. The study demonstrated that the risk of these cancers increased proportionally with cumulative radiation dose. For children receiving a cumulative dose of 50 to 60 milligray (mGy) to the head (mGy is a unit measuring absorbed ionizing radiation dose), researchers reported a threefold increase in the risk of brain tumors. A similar dose to the bone marrow, responsible for blood cell generation, resulted in a threefold increase in leukemia risk. The comparison group in this study consisted of individuals who had received cumulative doses of less than 5 mGy to the relevant body regions.
The number of CT scans required to reach a cumulative dose of 50-60mGy varies based on the CT scan type, patient age, and specific scanner settings. Using typical current settings for head CT scans in children, just two to three head CT scans could result in a 50-60mGy dose to the brain. The same dose to the red bone marrow would be reached after five to ten head CT scans using current settings for children under 15 years old.
Previous estimations of potential cancer risk from CT scans relied on risk projection models derived mainly from studies of atomic bomb survivors in Japan. The risks observed in the more recent study were consistent with these earlier estimations, reinforcing the validity of these models in predicting radiation-induced cancer risks from health care scanners.
It is crucial to emphasize that the absolute cancer risks associated with CT scans, even in children, are small. Lifetime cancer risk estimations in medical literature, using projection models based on atomic bomb survivor data, suggest approximately 1 additional cancer case for every 1,000 people scanned, with a maximum estimated incidence of about 1 in 500.
For an individual child, the benefits of a clinically necessary and properly performed CT examination using a health care scanner almost always outweigh the small associated risks. However, any unnecessary radiation exposure carries unnecessary risk. Therefore, minimizing radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans, whenever feasible, is crucial to reduce the projected number of CT-related cancers in the population.
Immediate Strategies to Minimize CT Radiation Exposure in Children
Minimizing radiation doses from health care scanners like CT machines in children is a shared responsibility among physicians, pediatric health care providers, CT technologists, CT manufacturers, and medical and governmental organizations. Several immediate steps can be implemented to reduce radiation exposure during pediatric CT examinations:
- Justify Every CT Examination: Close communication between pediatric health care providers and radiologists is essential to determine the absolute necessity of a CT scan and to decide on the most appropriate imaging technique. Established guidelines exist for CT scan indications in children. Radiologists should review the clinical reasons for every pediatric CT scan before it is performed and be readily available for consultation when the necessity of a CT is uncertain. When clinically appropriate, alternative imaging modalities that do not use ionizing radiation, such as ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), should be strongly considered as alternatives to health care scanners emitting radiation.
- Pediatric-Specific Exposure Parameter Adjustment:
- Child Size: Guidelines based on individual child size and weight parameters must be strictly followed when setting CT scanner parameters.
- Region Scanned: The anatomical region scanned should be limited to the smallest area clinically necessary to answer the diagnostic question.
- Organ Systems Imaged: Lower milliampere (mA) and/or kilovoltage peak (kVp) settings should be considered for imaging organ systems like the skeletal system, lungs, and for certain CT angiography and follow-up examinations, reducing overall radiation exposure from the health care scanner.
- Optimize Scan Resolution: The highest possible image quality, which typically requires the highest radiation dose, is not always necessary for accurate diagnoses. In many clinical scenarios, lower-resolution scans are perfectly adequate for diagnostic purposes. Providers should be familiar with dose descriptors available on CT scanners and diligently minimize the use of multiphase CT examinations. Multiphase examinations, involving multiple scans during different phases of contrast enhancement, significantly increase radiation dose and are rarely necessary, particularly in body (chest and abdomen) imaging in pediatrics.
Addressing Parental Questions:
Parents understandably have concerns about the radiation their children receive during CT examinations using health care scanners. Healthcare providers should be prepared to address common parental questions, such as:
- “Is a CT scan truly the best way to diagnose my child’s condition?”
- “Are there alternative diagnostic tests that do not involve radiation exposure?”
- “Will the CT scan results actually change the treatment plan for my child?”
- “Will the CT scan settings be adjusted specifically for my child’s size?”
- “Will the CT examination be performed at an accredited facility by a radiologist and radiology team experienced in pediatric CT procedures?”
Studies have shown that providing parents with clear information about the risks and benefits of CT scans does not decrease compliance with necessary medical imaging. Instead, it empowers parents to ask more informed questions and participate more actively in their children’s health care decisions.
When a CT scan is clinically justified, healthcare providers can reassure parents that the diagnostic benefits for their child outweigh the small long-term cancer risks associated with radiation exposure from the health care scanner.
Long-Term Strategies for Minimizing Pediatric CT Radiation
Beyond immediate measures, implementing long-term strategies is crucial to continuously minimize CT radiation exposure in children:
- Promote Pediatric CT Protocols: Continued development, refinement, and widespread adoption of standardized pediatric CT scanning protocols are essential. These protocols should be designed to optimize image quality while minimizing radiation dose for specific clinical indications and age groups.
- Encourage Selective Imaging Strategies: Promoting selective imaging strategies for common pediatric conditions, such as appendicitis, can significantly reduce unnecessary CT scans. Algorithms and clinical decision rules can help guide clinicians in choosing the most appropriate imaging modality, reserving CT scans for cases where they are truly necessary.
- Education and Dissemination: Ongoing education is vital for healthcare professionals both within and outside of radiology. Journal publications, conferences, and educational initiatives within organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Emergency Physicians are crucial for disseminating best practices in pediatric CT imaging. Readily accessible information sources, such as the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging (Image Gently Campaign), play a key role in educating both professionals and the public about radiation safety in pediatric imaging.
- Further Research: Continued research is needed to further refine our understanding of the relationship between CT image quality and radiation dose. Research should focus on customizing CT scanning techniques for individual children to optimize image quality at the lowest possible dose. Furthermore, ongoing research is necessary to clarify the long-term relationship between low-dose radiation exposure from health care scanners and cancer risk, allowing for more informed risk-benefit assessments.
Conclusion: Responsible Use of Health Care Scanners in Pediatrics
While CT scans remain an indispensable health care scanner and diagnostic tool in pediatrics, it is imperative for the entire health care community to collaborate in minimizing radiation doses to children. Radiologists must consistently prioritize the principle of “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA), using exposure settings meticulously customized for each child. All physicians ordering pediatric CT scans should continually and carefully assess the necessity of each scan on a case-by-case basis. When used judiciously and optimally, CT scans are among the most valuable imaging modalities available for both children and adults, providing crucial diagnostic information while mitigating potential risks.
Related Resources
Society for Pediatric Radiology
1891 Preston White Drive
Reston, Virginia 20191
http://www.pedrad.org
References
Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2007; 4:272-284.
Arch ME, Frush DP. Pediatric body MDCT: A 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008:191;611-617
Berrington de Gonzále. A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009; 169: 2071-7.
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003; 100:13761-13766.
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176:289-296.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Current concepts – Computed tomography – An increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:2277-2284.
Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL, Radiology AAoPSo. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007; 120:677-682.
Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: Estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiation Research 2007; 167:396-416.
Chodick G, Ronckers C, Ron E, Shalev V. The utilization of pediatric computed tomography in a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization. Pediatric Radiology 2006; 36:485-490.
Chodick G, Ronckers CM, Shalev V, Ron E. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Israel Medical Association Journal 2007; 9:584-587.
da Costa e Silva EJ, da Silva GA. Eliminating unenhanced CT when evaluating abdominal neoplasms in children. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 189:1211-1214.
Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children’s hospital. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176:303-306.
Frush DP, Applegate K. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2004; 1:113-119.
Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: What pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003; 112:951-957.
Garcia Peña BM, Cook EF, Mandl KD. Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Pediatrics 2004; 113:24-28.
Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al. The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatric Radiology 2008; 38:265-269.
Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 188:540-546.
Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ. Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: It’s OK to tell them. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 189:271-275.
McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT – Radiation dose in CT1. Radiographics 2002; 22:1541-1553.
Mettler FA, Jr., Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. Journal of Radiological Protection 2000; 20:353-359.
NAS. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2005.
NCRP. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report 160. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Bethesda, Maryland, 2009.
Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: Are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176:297-301.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (published online June 7th 2012).
Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research 2000; 154:178-186.
Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiation Research 2007; 168:1-64.
Rogers LF. Taking care of children: Check out the parameters used for helical CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176:287-287.
Slovis TL. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001. Pediatric Radiology 2002; 32:217-317.
Strauss KJ, Goske MJ. Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatric Radiology 2011; 41(suppl2):S472-482.
Thomas KE, Wang BB. Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatric Radiology 2008; 38:645-656.
